mirror of
https://github.com/minetest/contentdb.git
synced 2024-12-23 14:32:25 +01:00
41 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
title: WTFPL is a terrible license
|
||
toc: False
|
||
|
||
<div id="warning" class="alert alert-warning">
|
||
<span class="icon_message"></span>
|
||
|
||
Please reconsider the choice of WTFPL as a license.
|
||
|
||
<script>
|
||
// @author rubenwardy
|
||
// @license magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1f739d935676111cfff4b4693e3816e664797050&dn=gpl-3.0.txt GPL-v3-or-Later
|
||
|
||
var params = new URLSearchParams(location.search);
|
||
var r = params.get("r");
|
||
if (r) {
|
||
document.write("<a class='alert_right button' href='" + r + "'>Okay</a>");
|
||
} else {
|
||
document.getElementById("warning").style.display = "none";
|
||
}
|
||
</script>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
The use of WTFPL as a license is discouraged for multiple reasons.
|
||
|
||
* **No Warranty disclaimer:** This could open you up to being sued.<sup>[1]</sup>
|
||
* **Swearing:** This prevents settings like schools from using your content.
|
||
* **Not OSI Approved:** Same as public domain?
|
||
|
||
The Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source
|
||
license, saying:<sup>[3]</sup>
|
||
|
||
> It's no different from dedication to the public domain.
|
||
> Author has submitted license approval request – author is free to make public domain dedication.
|
||
> Although he agrees with the recommendation, Mr. Michlmayr notes that public domain doesn't exist in Europe. Recommend: Reject.
|
||
|
||
## Sources
|
||
|
||
1. [WTFPL is harmful to software developers](https://cubicspot.blogspot.com/2017/04/wtfpl-is-harmful-to-software-developers.html)
|
||
2. [FSF](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html)
|
||
3. [OSI](https://opensource.org/minutes20090304)
|