mirror of
https://github.com/minetest/contentdb.git
synced 2024-12-22 22:12:24 +01:00
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
title: WTFPL is a terrible license toc: False
Please reconsider the choice of WTFPL as a license.
<script>
// @author rubenwardy
// @license magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1f739d935676111cfff4b4693e3816e664797050&dn=gpl-3.0.txt GPL-v3-or-Later
var params = new URLSearchParams(location.search);
var r = params.get("r");
if (r) {
document.write("<a class='alert_right button' href='" + r + "'>Okay</a>");
} else {
document.getElementById("warning").style.display = "none";
}
</script>
The use of WTFPL as a license is discouraged for multiple reasons.
- No Warranty disclaimer: This could open you up to being sued.[1]
- Swearing: This prevents settings like schools from using your content.
- Not OSI Approved: Same as public domain?
The Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license, saying:[3]
It's no different from dedication to the public domain. Author has submitted license approval request – author is free to make public domain dedication. Although he agrees with the recommendation, Mr. Michlmayr notes that public domain doesn't exist in Europe. Recommend: Reject.